Goodluck India Limited v. United States
20-2017
The Federal Circuit reversed the CIT’s affirmation of Commerce’s remand, holding that Commerce’s decision to reject Goodluck India Ltd.’s questionnaire corrections in the antidumping duty investigation of cold-drawn mechanical tubing from India was supported by substantial evidence and in accordance with law. The CAFC agreed with Commerce that the corrections were not considered “minor.” As a result of the CAFC’s decision, a 33.8% percent AD rate will apply to Goodluck India Ltd.’s entries.