7/19/2022
By Maria José Etulain Director of Dumping Investigation Monitoring Center
By Maria José Etulain Director of Dumping Investigation Monitoring Center
The Argentine Republic, member of the WTO since 1995, has regularly resorted to the application of antidumping duties in the last 30 years, as an answer to unfair trade practices, following the rules of the multilateral space in which it participates (formerly GATT, now WTO).
At the end of 2021, Argentina had 5 % of the total antidumping measures, initiated or in force by WTO members, according to the official statistics found in: http://i-tip.wto.org/goods/Forms/MemberView.aspx?mode=modify&action=search
During more than 25 years working on dumping cases, either as member of the official team for antidumping investigations in Argentina, or as counselor advising companies in the private sector, it was always interesting for me to observe whether the adopted final antidumping measure had really served to achieve the objectives pursued.
At this point we must be clear: in an antidumping case, while the government will seek to temporarily protect the domestic producers of certain product, the private sector will be looking to harm the competitor's economic equation and/or to take/defend its market share.
At the end of 2021, Argentina had 5 % of the total antidumping measures, initiated or in force by WTO members, according to the official statistics found in: http://i-tip.wto.org/goods/Forms/MemberView.aspx?mode=modify&action=search
During more than 25 years working on dumping cases, either as member of the official team for antidumping investigations in Argentina, or as counselor advising companies in the private sector, it was always interesting for me to observe whether the adopted final antidumping measure had really served to achieve the objectives pursued.
At this point we must be clear: in an antidumping case, while the government will seek to temporarily protect the domestic producers of certain product, the private sector will be looking to harm the competitor's economic equation and/or to take/defend its market share.
Sections
Federal Circuit and CIT Case Summaries
Please enjoy brief summaries of key US CAFC and CIT case decisions from the past quarter. CITBA thanks Nithya Nagarajan, Camron Greer, Julia Banegas, and Lizzy Rettinger in Husch Blackwell LLP's Washington D.C. office, and Lydia Pardini, Associate at Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg LLP, for putting these together and sharing them.
DISCLAIMER: The CITBA Quarterly Electronic Newsletter is published as a free service for members of the Customs and International Trade Bar Association. The Newsletter is for general information only and is not legal advice for any purpose. Opinions reflected in the Featured Articles are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the position of CITBA, its members, the Board of Directors, or Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A. Neither CITBA and its officers and members nor Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., assume liability for the accuracy of the information provided.